About your Search

20121121
20121129
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
is the most difficult thing for you to control as you get this show on the road? >> my energy. >> you probably have to drink a lot of coffee. >> we stay up for a really long time, so coffee is our friend. there's nothing you can control. you can plan all you want. the parade is made up of 10,000 volunteers. it's their energy that keeps this perception going. we've got a brand-new parade route this year. we're going to march down sixth avenue. it's wider, direct, right down to macy's a lot more public space. we're used to having 3.5 million people in new york see it. it's going to be a magnificent day. >> i always feel for the folks that are performing in those little skirts and the drum majors and the like. do they ever complain, or is it just such an honor? >> they really don't complain. they know up front it's going to be cold. most of the time if they look underdressed, they've got a lot of layers underneath. what's interesting, we have the band practice at 3:00 in the morning. not only is it cold but it's dark. and these bands come from all over the country. so many of them have never even
worth having and it wasn't clear the republicans, there really was this type of energy if you will in the republican conference on the senate side to do something like that. then secondly on the merits and this is what bill crystal was hinting at. bill crystal, neoconservative if you will and interventionist and there is certainly a big chunk of senate republicans that put themselves in that respect. if you take a look at the philosophical differences, that's why he ends upsiding on the susan rice, much more interventionist if you will than a john kerry. john kerry, somebody that has a history of voting against intervening and i think suddenly a lot of these guys said wait a minute we can have a benghazi proxy fight in another avenue, maybe if these are the two choices we'll line up susan rice, not john kerry. >> go to the treasury department. suggesting that replacing tim geithner with a woman would help break up the old boys wall street club. there are the ladies on the long list, christina romer, laura tyson, janet yellen. what are you hearing about who could be rising to t
issues in the world, and we are consuming our time and the energy and the viewers' even attention to be focus odd exactly the words. they said terrorist attack. it's enough. we should move forward and focus on the major issues taking place in that moment that are connected to our future and the security of this nation. libya, remember, today we found there was weapons coming. >> correct. >> and they were intercepted and they came from libya. it's still an open box and it's still -- there's a lot of questions about the libyan ability to control the various group that are operating in this moment. >> mm-hmm. >> we need to handle them differently. smart policy, less attacks, talk less, and more actions. >> my power panel for this wednesday, thanks so much. i really appreciate it. have a great holiday to all of you. >>> fwhak the arena, general jon allen back to afghanistan in kabul after being investigated for inappropriate e-mails with a woman linked to the petraeus scandal. could the general return to work too? >>> plus, what a roller coaster ride for the twinkie this week. from go
the consulate and then what happened afterwards. and i think that's where we should be focusing our energy. i think that, look, if the president chooses to nominate her to be secretary of state, she's very well qualified. she should be able to receive a fair hearing from in the senate. and i hope she gets that because she's done a great service for this country over the course of the last four years. >> one thing i want to show to everybody is that a new cnn poll out shows a majority of americans believe that the white house misstatements were based on the best information that officials had at the time. 40% say there was no cover-up. so jonathan, does this meeting give the senators, you know, because of that? and we look at this poll, i mean how american people feel about this. does this meeting give the senators basically new ground to move forward on to try to discredit or try to claim that there's some type of deeper cover-up that went on prior to the election? >> well, looking at those results, it was -- it would seem to me that, you know, the senators took a big risk here because the ma
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4